<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timex Expedition WS4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldwatchreview.com/2009/04/29/timex-expedition-ws4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldwatchreview.com/2009/04/29/timex-expedition-ws4/</link>
	<description>Ars Longa, Vita Brevis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evgueni Matoussevitch</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwatchreview.com/2009/04/29/timex-expedition-ws4/comment-page-1/#comment-26117</link>
		<dc:creator>Evgueni Matoussevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwatchreview.com/?p=557#comment-26117</guid>
		<description>Hey BOB, thanks for the comment.

You mean, there is a problem with water resistance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey BOB, thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>You mean, there is a problem with water resistance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwatchreview.com/2009/04/29/timex-expedition-ws4/comment-page-1/#comment-26113</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwatchreview.com/?p=557#comment-26113</guid>
		<description>Read the reviews about the WS4 and was very  impressed.
However, I discovered some negative points later.
One being that it is very difficult to clean.
And the second point is that it isn&#039;t good to use when swimming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the reviews about the WS4 and was very  impressed.<br />
However, I discovered some negative points later.<br />
One being that it is very difficult to clean.<br />
And the second point is that it isn&#8217;t good to use when swimming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJKham</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwatchreview.com/2009/04/29/timex-expedition-ws4/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>DJKham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwatchreview.com/?p=557#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>Amazing watch...especially for the price.  Had one for a couple weeks and it has been amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing watch&#8230;especially for the price.  Had one for a couple weeks and it has been amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: der Uhrmacher</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwatchreview.com/2009/04/29/timex-expedition-ws4/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>der Uhrmacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwatchreview.com/?p=557#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Oh, shame on me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, shame on me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Metric</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwatchreview.com/2009/04/29/timex-expedition-ws4/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Metric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwatchreview.com/?p=557#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>Actually mount Everest is 8848 meters. I would&#039;nt rely on a Timex anyway, but according to the specs it would handle Everest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually mount Everest is 8848 meters. I would&#8217;nt rely on a Timex anyway, but according to the specs it would handle Everest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

