Revue Thommen Airspeed Instrument RT1920

The Swiss watch manufacturer has just presented a new member of its controversial Bell&Ross-styled Airspeed Instrument line of aviator watches.
Called Revue Thommen Airspeed Instrument RT1920, the model differs from the rest of the pack with its black PVD-coated case and more upscale-looking hour indices and hands made of some sort of yellow metal (can it be gold or something?)

Just like its source of inspiration (I assume, it was the BR01 model), the RT1920 sports the same square case with four screws at each angle and a round bezel with a sapphire glass covering a set of hour, minute and second hands reminding us of aviation instruments.
While the claim to the company’s aviation legacy is quite legitimate (long time ago Revue Thommen indeed used to make money producing cockpit instruments and gauges for the aviation,) the result is quite disappointing. Trying to differentiate their product from the original series by Bell&Ross, Revue Thommen’s designers somehow lost the original point of the watch.
Its main problem is that, with new styling of the dial layout, the watch doesn’t look very much like an instrument gauge. Rather, it feels just like another rip-off of the popular model by B&R available at about half the price of the original.
What is your opinion, anyway?
Revue Thommen Airspeed Instrument RT1920 watch’s specification:
Price range: $1320
Movement: Swiss ETA caliber 2824-2, automatic, 28,800 vph, 25 jewels
Complications: Date
Power reserve: 42 hours
Case material: Stainless steel in PVD
Case size: 44 mm
Case height: N/A
Dial: Navy blue
Water resistance: 50m
Strap: Leather with contrast stitching
Crystal: Sapphire
Share
Tags: 44 mm, Airspeed Instrument, Automatic, ETA 2824-2, pilot's watch, PVD, Revue Thommen, square
Posted in Swiss Watches



December 19th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
Hello i would like to ask how much cost a wach REVUE THOMMEN T44?THAMK YOU IN ADVANCE
February 23rd, 2010 at 1:43 pm
Yes, I agree with you.It is a rip off on B&R but again what inspire B&R designer?
again it is still a rip-off from the cockpit layout, whos’ idea is more original, it just a matter of who manipulated it first?
With such great heritage, it a shame for RT to agree with the designer idea.