Tudor Grantour Chrono Fly-Back (Ref. 20550N) Swiss

Looking at the new Tudor Grantour Chrono Fly-Back that was officially presented last March during the annual Baselworld 2011 show, I can’t figure out whether Rolex is serious about its resurrected entry-luxury sub-brand or just amuses itself with an old toy.

From the exterior point of view, the new timekeeper looks good, even classy. Its black bezel with stylized Arabic numerals is not crafted from polished ceramic, however, the lacquer seems to be of high quality and it nicely echoes the black background of the dial.

Unlike another model from the same collection, the bezel is fixed, so the Grantour Chrono cannot be used as a GMT watch. Well, I can live with that.

Tudor Grantour Chrono Fly-Back 20550N

The bistable lockable chronograph pusher at 2 o’clock is equipped with a bright red marking, which is supported with red accents on the timekeeper’s face.

The layout of the dial with the small seconds indicator at 9 o’clock, a chronograph counter at 3 hours, and a date aperture at 6 o’clock is also okay. It is inspired by the 1970s Tudor Monte Carlo Heritage Chronograph.

The vintage timekeeper was powered by the good old Rolex Valjoux Caliber 234 hand-wound movement. However, around 30 years ago the Swiss brand reintroduced the model with the well-known Valjoux 7750 caliber.

I am not sure about this particular model (in its press release Tudor only says that it is animated by an “automatic” caliber,) but, sold under an “entry-level” brand, it may also be powered by a mass-produced Swiss-made movement. Most probably, it features the same ETA 2892 automatic movement with the Dubois-Depraz DD 2054 module that powered the 2010 “re-edition” of the Monte Carlo. If that’s indeed the case, then Rolex stepped on the same rake twice.

Tudor Grantour Chrono Fly-Back (Ref. 20550N), front view

The problem is not only that a model of this class must be equipped with a natural-born chronograph caliber (we understand that Rolex won’t equip Tudor watches with its own in-house movement,) but that the DD 2054 piggy-back module is known for its reliability issues.

And when it comes to repairing the module, it is easier to buy a new one, which may be a cause of severe headaches after the module is discontinued and will definitely significantly reduce the resale value of the ref. 20550N.

Well, if this doesn’t bother you and if you do not treat it as an investment (which it isn’t) then there is no reason not to get one.

It looks great, fits both casual and formal dress and must feel great on a wrist thanks to its relatively compact size of 42 millimeters.

There is still no info regarding its price but I expect it to retail at around $5500.

See also: Tudor Heritage Advisor Automatic Alarm

Photos: Tudor

Tudor Grantour Chrono Fly-Back (Ref. 20550N) specification

Price: $4400 (MSRP)
Movement: Automatic, Swiss Made
Functions: Hours, minutes, seconds, date, chronograph
Power reserve: 42 hours
Case: Stainless steel
Bezel: Stainless steel, black lacquered
Shape: Tonneau
Bezel shape: Round
Size: 42.00 mm
Dial: Black
Numerals: Luminous hour-markers
Hands: Luminous
Water resistance: 150 meters
Strap: Stainless steel bracelet
Crystal: Sapphire
Back: Solid

Previous post:
Citizen Eco-Drive Signature Perpetual Calendar Diving Watch

Next post:
Deep Blue Daynight T-100 Tritium Flat Tubes Diver


  1. Nikana reklaw Says: June 17, 2011 at 5:17 pm

    Tudor will never succeed as a desirable brand so long as it doesnt carry d rolex name. D idiots in management shd ask armani exchange for a lesson in branding. N rolex itself is alienating millions of young effluent asians by not modernising n upsizing its designs. In Asia rolex is your uncle’s watch. D fool who refused to change will be left behind by a changing world. Rolex may retain its legions of old fart loyalists but it misses out on millions of new recruits by stubbornly being rooted to tradition. Take a lesson in design fr Rebellion, Hysek, Graham & Blu with a new product line extension n you’ll see new biz growth like never before, u morons.

Comments are closed.